Dallas Distracted Driving Accident Lawyer
Hit by a texting driver, distracted rideshare driver, or distracted delivery driver in Dallas? Texas Transportation Code §545.4251 makes texting while driving a statewide offense — and Texas juries treat knowing distraction harshly under the gross-negligence standard. We pull phone records, infotainment-system data, and dashcam footage. Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
Free Case Consultation
No Obligation — No Cost Unless We Win
Dallas distracted driving law — quick answers
- Is texting illegal in Texas? Yes — Tex. Transp. Code §545.4251 (Alex Brown's Law) bans reading, writing, or sending electronic messages while driving statewide.
- Statute of limitations? Two years under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §16.003.
- How to prove distraction? Phone records, infotainment data, dashcam footage, CR-3 Code 17 (Distraction in Vehicle).
- Comparative fault? 50% or less under §33.001 — damages reduced by your fault percentage.
- Exemplary damages? Under §41.003 — Texas juries treat knowing distraction harshly. Available where gross negligence is shown by clear and convincing evidence.
- Employer liability? Yes — under respondeat superior if the driver was in the course and scope of employment (rideshare, delivery, commercial drivers).
Distracted driving in Dallas — the statistics and the law
TxDOT classifies distraction-related crashes as a top-5 cause of Texas traffic injuries and fatalities. The most common distractions identified by responding officers on the CR-3 are cell phone use, infotainment-system interaction, eating and drinking, passenger interaction, and "external distraction" (looking at billboards, crash sites, or scenery). In Dallas County, distraction is identified as Contributing Factor 1 or Contributing Factor 2 in a substantial portion of urban-corridor crashes — particularly on US-75, I-35E, Loop 12, and the Dallas North Tollway.
Texas's primary statute is Tex. Transp. Code §545.4251 — Alex Brown's Law — which took effect in 2017. It prohibits any driver from using a wireless communication device to read, write, or send an electronic message while operating a motor vehicle. The City of Dallas and many Dallas-area suburbs have additional ordinances making handheld use illegal for all purposes, not just messaging. Violation of an ordinance can support a negligence per se theory in the civil case.
The defense playbook in a distracted-driving case is to challenge whether the driver was actually using the phone at the moment of impact. We counter with cell-tower records, app usage logs (Uber, DoorDash, Snapchat, Instagram timestamps), the vehicle's infotainment-system pairing logs, dashcam and traffic-cam footage showing the driver's posture, and witness testimony. In commercial-driver cases under FMCSR 49 CFR §392.80, handheld use carries a complete ban.
Common Dallas distracted driving crash patterns
- Rear-end at signalized intersections. A driver looking at the phone fails to see the lead vehicle slowing for a red light. Routine on Mockingbird, Lemmon, Northwest Highway, and Lower Greenville Avenue.
- Freeway lane drifts. A driver scrolling Instagram or Snapchat drifts across lane lines on US-75, I-35E, I-635, or the Dallas N Tollway. Tex. Transp. Code §545.060 (driving within a single lane) governs.
- Intersection signal-running. A driver looking down at the phone misses the signal change and T-bones cross-street traffic. CR-3 contributing factors typically include both Code 14 (Disregard Signal) and Code 17 (Distraction in Vehicle).
- Pedestrian and bicycle strikes in walkable Dallas neighborhoods. Bishop Arts, Deep Ellum, Uptown, and Lower Greenville have heavy pedestrian density. A distracted driver fails to see a crosswalk pedestrian — Tex. Transp. Code §552.003 violation.
- Rideshare and delivery-driver distraction. Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, GrubHub, and Amazon Flex drivers using the platform app while moving. Course-and-scope-of-employment makes the gig company's commercial-auto coverage available.
- Commercial truck distraction. FMCSR 49 CFR §392.80 bans handheld use by CDL drivers. Violation supports negligent-supervision and gross-negligence claims against the motor carrier.
Texas distracted driving law — what Dallas crash victims should know
Alex Brown's Law (§545.4251)
Tex. Transp. Code §545.4251 bans using a wireless communication device to read, write, or send an electronic message while driving statewide. Class C misdemeanor for a first offense.
School-zone phone ban (§545.425)
Texas prohibits all handheld phone use in school zones during posted hours. Violation in a school zone crash strongly supports gross-negligence pleadings.
Novice-driver ban (§545.424)
Drivers under 18 are prohibited from using any wireless device while driving, except in emergency. Violation supports negligence per se.
Commercial driver ban (49 CFR §392.80)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations ban any handheld use by CDL drivers. Violation supports gross-negligence claims against both the driver and the motor carrier.
Two-year statute of limitations (§16.003)
Two years from the date of the crash. Cell-phone records have shorter preservation windows — subpoenas need to go out quickly.
Modified comparative fault (§33.001)
51% bar — you can recover if you were 50% or less at fault. Damages are reduced by your fault percentage.
Exemplary damages (§41.003)
Available on clear and convincing evidence of fraud, malice, or gross negligence. Knowing texting while driving is the prototypical gross-negligence fact pattern under Texas jury-instruction PJC 2.13.
Employer respondeat superior
If the at-fault driver was acting in the course and scope of employment, the employer is vicariously liable. Critical in rideshare, delivery, and commercial-driver cases where personal-policy limits are inadequate.
Where Dallas distracted driving cases are heard
Dallas County District Courts
George L. Allen Sr. Courts Building, 600 Commerce Street, Dallas. The 14th, 44th, 68th, 95th, 101st, 116th, 134th, 160th, 162nd, 191st, 192nd, 193rd, 298th, and 330th District Courts handle civil cases.
Surrounding counties
Collin County (McKinney), Denton County (Denton), Tarrant County (Fort Worth), Ellis County (Waxahachie), Kaufman County (Kaufman). Venue under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §15.002 is typically where the crash occurred.
Federal court (N.D. Tex., Dallas Division)
1100 Commerce Street, Dallas. Available where there is complete diversity of citizenship and more than $75,000 in controversy under 28 U.S.C. §1332.
Stowers leverage
When the at-fault carrier refuses a reasonable within-limits demand, the Texas Stowers doctrine exposes the insurer to liability for any excess judgment.
Other Dallas car accident cases we handle
Common questions from Dallas distracted driving clients
Is texting while driving illegal in Texas?
How do I prove the other driver was texting?
What if the at-fault driver was on a work call or app?
Texas is a comparative fault state — what if I was also distracted?
What damages can I recover after a Dallas distracted driving crash?
What if the distracted driver killed a family member?
Where are Dallas distracted driving cases heard?
How much does it cost to hire Patterson Law Group?
Hit by a distracted driver in Dallas? Talk to a Texas trial lawyer today.
Texas firm with 30+ years experience · Free consultation · No fee unless we win · Available 24/7 · Se habla español